Is it Better To Be Lucky Than Good?

-
Luck is one of the components of mojo, as I have said in an earlier post. However, it is important to understand a few things about luck.  For one, almost nobody is lucky all the time.  Only when a person is gone can you consider whether or not they were lucky.  Being lucky means you had better than average luck more often than not.  Luck over a lifetime is one of many things that follows a Gaussian curve, as illustrated in Figure 1.  At the tails you have people whose luck has been very, very good or very, very bad.  In the middle are people (many more people) whose luck averages out over a lifetime.

Now consider a person who is far luckier (or unluckier) than average so far.  There is no indication from what has happened so far as to what will happen in the next event from a pure luck standpoint. During a lifetime, luck can change many times in many ways.  

It was Branch Rickey  who was reported to have said, "Luck is the residue of design."  Many situations in baseball,  which after all was where Branch Rickey made his name, appear to be dependent on luck.  In reality, I believe they are dependent on a  combination of factors, only one of which is luck.  When a ball is hit directly to a fielder and it is caught, it is lucky that the fielder was in a position to reach it, but completing the catch required some skill in addition.  Here's another baseball example.  Suppose there is a left-handed batter at the plate.  The defensive manager directs the shortstop and center fielder to play on the first base side of midfield.  This is sometimes called "the shift".  Now the batter hits the ball directly to the center fielder who catches it.  Is this just lucky?  No.  The shift is a conscious decision based on experience and expertise that tell the manager that the odds are a left-hander will pull the ball toward the first base side.  This is not luck. It is design, as Mr. Rickey said.  However, there is luck that the ball went close enough to a fielder to be caught.  And there is skill involved in the fielder's not botching the catch.

 Lou Gehrig, in his famous retirement speech at Yankee Stadium, said "Today, I consider myself the luckiest man on the face of the earth."  Was he the beneficiary of luck during his playing days? Sure, but there was also a lot of experience and expertise involved.  Was he unlucky to have fallen to ALS?  Sure, despite the famous speech.  Go back to the Gaussian curve.  Sometimes, we are lucky; sometimes, not so much.

Figure 2.  Lucky?
Consider the planets in Figure 2.  Was I lucky to capture them so close together, or was it a combination including the expertise of many scientists? Just because a person was lucky before, doesn't mean they will be lucky again.  However, when there are many factors involved including luck, it might make sense to rely on a "lucky" person, because the other factors may make them successful again even if luck doesn't.  Take Michael Jordan, for example.  He is quoted to have said,"I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed."  The take home lesson is that luck can go either way.  However, the best person to pick is still the one with the most skill, the Michael Jordan.

I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.
Read more at https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/michael-jordan-quotes
I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.
Read more at https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/michael-jordan-quotes
I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.
Read more at https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/michael-jordan-quotes
I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.
Read more at https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/michael-jordan-quotes
I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.
Read more at https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/michael-jordan-quotes

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
Image
  Mojo Heroes And Antiheroes There are both heroes and antiheroes among people with high mojo. There is no law that says a person with high mojo has to be a nice person. Sometimes they are, sometimes they aren’t. Let’s define anti-hero. Webster says an anti-hero is “a protagonist or notable figure who is conspicuously lacking in heroic qualities”. Examples of heroic qualities are strength, ability, achievement, courage, and nobility. The number of anti-heroes compared to heroes is greater in fiction than in real life. It is just more fun to write about or play the more complex characters typified by anti-heroes. It exploits the talents of the actors better. It also seems as if there are more anti-heroes today than in prior years. But all of the people I am about to mention had high mojo, whether hero or anti-hero. In an earlier post , I described the top 10 American people with high mojo. They were George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Ronald Reagan, Benjamin F
Read more

Top 10 Mojo Effects

-
Image
Top 10 Mojo Effects I am going to concentrate on the effects of a high mojo individual or set of individuals on a group of people, rather than on individuals themselves who have mojo. If you acquire more mojo for your group, you may experience one or more of these effects. There are three types of effects that you will see. There are the direct effects of increasing mojo on the group. There are the indirect effects of the example set by adding the mojo. Lastly, there are the synergistic effects each group member experiences from having a teammate with mojo. When you add mojo to your group, you also add each of the component of mojo : motivation , expertise , experience , support , faith , willingness to act , and luck . Obviously there is a net increase in each of these in the group. But with them, you get an example of proper attitude, behavior, and preparation (see below for the effects these will have). Also, each member of your group will come to know that they have a rol
Read more

How To Know If You Are Too Old

-
Image
Age and mojo How old can you be to start an activity? You have probably heard all of these: Age is just a number You are never too old  Youth isn’t all it’s cracked up to be There is no age limit to anything On the other hand, proverbial wisdom says: Youth must be served You need to do something for 10,000 hours before you can be good at it, If you fail early, you can learn from the experience before others even get started. It is easier to adopt good habits when you are young. These statements conflict with other. What is the truth? I will discuss four different ways of looking at age. Average “best” age Inspiration from outstanding performances at advanced ages Age limiting factors Age preventative measure People speak of a peak age for any given event. The best way to look at age is as a probability. For example, the probable peak age for a female gymnast is in the early teens. The probable peak age for a sprinter is in the late tw
Read more