Goals Are For Losers.

-


Systems or goals, which is better?

I think not. Consider the pros and cons of goals verses systems.  I think you will agree with me.

 Goals

Pros: Well defined, specific, easily time limited, easily measured.

Cons: What do you do if they are met.? What do you do if time goes by and they are not met?  It's easy to rationalize waiting to test. Inflexible.

Systems

Pros: No time limit, usually a lifestyle change, flexible, adaptable to circumstances, systems become habits.

Cons: No time limit, no well defined tests.
 
What comes after you test your goal?  Better to shoot for a process or a system. Find a system that you like instead of a goal. For example, you might say to yourself, "I am a runner."  "I will run regularly."  Each day, you get up and know that running is a process, a part of your being, that you will want to do. Its the same thing if you are, say, a painter. When you wake up, you just know that you want to paint something today. This will help with motivation.  With a system, it doesn't make much difference if you skip a day here and there.  You still have your system, even if your test must be delayed.

Another thing about goals is that they are usually only temporary. It can be hard to know if you are ready to test your goal. If you do test it, then what?  Will you have adopted a healthy habit? It has been said that "Goals are for losers."  This may be overly harsh but the sentiment is right on.  A system is likely to change your behavior for the better.  A goal, even if met, requires ongoing motivation to change your behavior.

I have to give credit to Scott Adams, of Dilbert fame, from whom I first heard of this approach.  Next year, try setting a New Year's resolution to follow a system instead if setting a goal.  You might be pleasantly surprised.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
Image
  Mojo Heroes And Antiheroes There are both heroes and antiheroes among people with high mojo. There is no law that says a person with high mojo has to be a nice person. Sometimes they are, sometimes they aren’t. Let’s define anti-hero. Webster says an anti-hero is “a protagonist or notable figure who is conspicuously lacking in heroic qualities”. Examples of heroic qualities are strength, ability, achievement, courage, and nobility. The number of anti-heroes compared to heroes is greater in fiction than in real life. It is just more fun to write about or play the more complex characters typified by anti-heroes. It exploits the talents of the actors better. It also seems as if there are more anti-heroes today than in prior years. But all of the people I am about to mention had high mojo, whether hero or anti-hero. In an earlier post , I described the top 10 American people with high mojo. They were George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Ronald Reagan, Benjam...
Read more

10 Highest Mojo Colleges

-
Image
10 Highest Mojo Colleges Many sources make lists. Wikipedia is a source that does a good job of describing how a list is built. But I don't rely on it. Instead, I used endowment , acceptance rate , the US News rank , and my own judgement as my sources in making my list. sually, lists rank colleges for suitability for an individual or for best overall rank. However, mine ranks the colleges with the highest mojo, not the best academics, sports, campuses, etc. I included US News’ overall rank because a high placement on such a list is one indication (not the only one) of mojo. Another one that I use is endowment. If alumni have money ad want to give it to their alma mater, that indicates that the alma mater has mojo. Another indicator that I use is acceptance rate. If a lot more people apply to a college than are accepted, that is a further indication of mojo. Also note that the military academies are in a different group for purposes of evaluation, but I include a co...
Read more

How Mojo Works

-
Image
Figure 1. The components of mojo. What makes up mojo? Merriam Webster says: Mojo is :” a magic spell, hex, or charm, broadly : magical power // works his mojo on the tennis court //The team has lost its mojo.“ I’m not sure about the magic part of it, but mojo is something that a person or group has to varying degrees. You know it when you see it, even if you can’t define it. Another example of such a thing was cited by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart who famously said in his 1964 Order , he could not use words to describe pornography but " I know it when I see it ." When something is not well understood, it is indistinguishable from magic . Maybe this is why people are often said to have their “mojo workin’” even if magic is irrelevant. Parts of Mojo motivation expertise experience support luck faith willingness to act. This blog will focus on motivation because it is such a big part of mojo and is often a poorly under...
Read more